The Unforgiving Minute
The only really happy folk are married women and single men.
H. L. Mencken

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

I can remember what it was like to have free time.

Yeah, if you hadn’t noticed, the blog has slipped WAY down on my list of priorities. My new job, nominally a straight 40 hrs/wk, has been keeping me busy with overtime lately. Six-day work weeks, while lucrative, do not leave me with tons of spare time. And what little spare time I have is best spent with my girlfriend, so blogging’s gonna be sporadic at best for the foreseeable future.

If I ever get out to the range, there will be a range report and pictures. Not too sure when that’ll happen, though…

posted by TD at 10:59 pm  

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Whew.

You know what’s fun? When a two-week project gets condensed into a one-week project and then a three-day project. Today was very, very VERY busy and tomorrow’s gonna be worse. Just smile and think of the paychecks…

posted by TD at 11:47 pm  

Friday, June 4, 2010

At this point it’s just embarrassing.

Vera is still propped up in the corner, unfired. So is Sophie. And I just agreed to pick up more overtime on what would have been my next day off.

One of these days I’m actually going to go shooting. No, really. I am!

posted by TD at 12:10 am  

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Say hello to Sophie.

One of the many back-burner “someday” projects I’ve finally had a chance to pursue is a high-grade scoped bolt-action .22. This one has actually been sitting in the back of my mind fully-formed for a good four or five years, just waiting for the right time.

The time finally came. CZ announced they were phasing out the 452 rimfire series in favor of a revised model 455, starting with the American model this year. Other variants will make the 452 -> 455 switch next year. The revamped model adds a switch-barrel feature (which I wouldn’t use) but deletes the second bolt lug (which I definitely want). And since I had my heart set the American model, now’s the time. It also helped that my friend ernunnos finally went ahead and bought the CZ 452 FS he’s been wanting.

A little looking around revealed that Cabela’s was closing out 452 Americans for $399. After a quick phone call to confirm that they still had guns in stock, I hopped in the car and headed to the Cabela’s in Dundee. The helpful clerk even let me look at the three different guns they had in stock so I could pick out the best wood. Here’s what I got, nice Turkish walnut with some pretty, flowing grain and a bit of fiddleback. The pics flat-out suck, and I apologize. It’s overcast today so I had to use flash, hence the glare. Also, I’m a shitty photographer. But you guys know that by now. Trust me when I say it looks better in person.

stock right sidestock left side

The scope choice was, for me, a non-choice: Leupold’s 2-7x Rimfire Special is the only way to fly. Well, they were called Rimfire Specials for years and years, but at some point fairly recently Leupold rebranded this model as a VX-I Rimfire. I’m still calling it a Rimfire Special. It’s a neat, tidy scope that looks proportional on a .22 and offers very good optics at a reasonable price. It’s almost identical to the 2-7x Ultralight, but with friction instead of click adjustments, a lower grade of lens coatings, parallax set to 60 yards, and 1/3 knocked off the price.

Scope rings, too, were an obvious choice: I’ve been a big fan of Talleys for years. This particular set, though, is a special, almost secret thing, because they were color casehardened by Doug Turnbull himself. You will not find these on Talley’s website or listed in their catalog, but if you call them up and ask nicely, they might have a set for you. They are not cheap; the color casehardening adds a full $100 premium to the regular price, but to me it’s money well spent.

Talley rings

Here’s the scope secured in the Talleys. I like the bit of contrast provided by the color casehardening against the blued rifle and scope. These are medium-height fixed rings, and they’re the perfect height. The bolt handle clearance is just enough for easy cycling.

scoped CZbolt clearance

Total weight is just under 7 1/4 lbs, which is light enough to be handy but substantial enough to be a reasonable understudy for a full-size centerfire rifle. The CZ factory test target shows 4 rounds touching with a “flyer” about 1/4″ away, fired at 50 meters. I’ll be headed out to the range soon to see what it can do in my hands.

My girlfriend, who named my AR Vera, decided that this rifle’s name is Sophie. It’s fitting; an elegant name for an elegant rifle.

posted by TD at 1:14 pm  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Buy a Gun Day is behind us…

But the first annual Buy A Sex Toy Day is coming up on June 4th!

posted by TD at 2:23 pm  

Monday, May 3, 2010

I should have done this years ago.

For the last 15 years I’ve gone through a succession of cheap inkjet printers, mostly HP with one or two Canons thrown in. They were at best “alright”, with the early ones being slow and heavy but solid and well-made. With commoditization and relentless competition, printer makers raced each other downward both in price and quality. My last two printers were “free”, bundled with PC purchases, and worth every penny I paid for them.

The hardware was all flimsy plastic, ink cartridges seemed to get both shorter-lived and harder to refill, drivers grew ridiculously bloated and flaky, and reliability just flat-out sucked. None of them had network support, either, so I ended up either sneakernetting files to the machine attached to the printer or futzing around with host-based printer sharing setups.

All along I’ve wanted to do it the right way and get a “real” printer, a networked laser with PostScript support. Back in the day I bought inkjets because good lasers cost as much as (or more than!) a computer, and since my printing needs are pretty light I could limp along well enough with the little light-duty ink-squirters. Still, I always had it in the back of my mind to finally get a decent printer.

Then I saw an ad from Newegg for a little Samsung ML-2851ND network laser printer, on sale for $119 with free shipping (it’s currently $149). Hell, I paid 3x that for my first HP DeskJet back in the day!

A little research turned up good reviews and, more important for me, excellent support for non-Windows platforms. Some low-end lasers use oddball proprietary print languages (like Samsung’s own SPL), which make you jump through conversion/filtering hoops if you’re using a *nix operating system. The ML-2851 does PostScript and supports the classic Unix LPD/LPR printing, so it “just works” with basically no fuss.

I ordered one up, got it three days later and plugged it into the switch. It pulled an IP address off the router and went right to work. OS X automagically found and configured the printer (I’m using the generic PostScript driver, haven’t even looked at the driver CD that came with the printer). The OpenBSD boxes only needed a very simple /etc/printcap file along the lines of:

lp|Samsung ML-2851ND PostScript network printer:\
    :lp=:\
    :sh:\
    :rm=<IP address>:\
    :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:

My first test print from OpenBSD showed the classic UNIX “stair-step” printing phenomenon, like so:

line 1
      wraps to line 2
                     like this

This comes from a difference between DOS/Windows machines, which use both a carriage return character and a line feed character to indicate a new line (CR+LF), and *real* computers, which only use a line feed (LF). The Unix box was sending LFs to move down a line, but not CRs to move back to the left margin, hence the stair-step effect. Fortunately, Samsung includes an option in the printer settings to switch between the two newline styles.

So far I’m pretty impressed with this little printer. Administration is done via a simple and very thorough Web-based control panel; it supports almost every printing protocol on the planet (still use EtherTalk? you’re in luck!), you have fine-grained control over individual printing protocols and security settings… Basically, everything I’d want is in there. The only thing missing is a way of changing settings directly on the printer itself; there’s no display or control buttons on the printer aside from the usual idiot lights and the “I put more paper in, please start printing again” button.

Print quality is very nice, speed’s great, duplexing is supported, and it idles at 8 watts yet warms up in just a few seconds. I haven’t owned it long enough to comment on long-term durability, but so far I think it offers a helluva lot more value for the dollar than my “free” inkjets ever did.

posted by TD at 10:31 pm  

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Too many choices.

New PC tentative plans:

  • AMD Phenom II x6 1055T (I’ll wait for the 95w version, not interested in a 125w space heater)
  • Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 motherboard (880G chipset)
  • 4 gigs of ECC RAM
  • Intel X25-M 80-gig SSD boot drive
  • A couple big Seagate spinning disks for data

My current desktop machine is 7 years old; I’m pretty well due for an upgrade. Any input from my geek friends? Sounds like a reasonable setup?

posted by TD at 7:18 pm  

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Finishing Touches

The weather’s turning, I’m done with the graveyard shifts, and there’s a range trip in the not-too-distant future. It’s time to wrap up the last details on the lightweight AR project (henceforth known as Project Vera).

First, some good blastin’ ammo to get sighted in and make sure she’s running smoothly:

ammo

Widener’s has these 400-round packs of Federal XM193 for $142. With shipping that came out to only $0.38/round, which isn’t bad at all for American-made, brass-cased 5.56.

sight

I also sprung for a Trijicon tritium front post, because (A) it’s handy in low light and (B) I just like supporting Trijicon. The design is pretty neat, with the actual sight blade a separate piece that can rotate independently of the screw. This way you can make quarter-turn elevation adjustments and still keep the tritium vial pointed back towards the shooter.

hat

And my girlfriend, the one who named the rifle “Vera”, surprised me with the perfect finishing touch: a miniature Jayne hat. Yes, she’s awesome.

posted by TD at 10:47 pm  

Sunday, April 11, 2010

I really oughta update this thing once in a while.

Still here, still alive. Just very busy with the new job, which has had me working the graveyard shift and picking up some unexpected (but welcome!) overtime. With the old job I had no money but plenty of time, now I have money but no time. I’m hoping things will settle down in a few weeks.

I’m also hoping to get the new AR out to the range one day Real Soon Now, since I have 400 rounds of Federal XM193 coming to me. Range report will follow!

posted by TD at 5:23 pm  

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

And now the wordy bit.

AR-15

What I wanted, why I wanted it, how I decided to get there.

When I finally decided to go down the AR road, I made a conscious choice to go for the lightest reasonable weight possible without resorting to exotica like special lightweight aluminum bolt carriers or other racegun parts. Basically, I wanted a light, handy carbine, a modern descendant of the M1 carbine of the WWII era. I specifically did NOT want to go the way of so many modern M4geries, covered in yards of Picatinny rail and accessories of dubious value, and mashing the scales at 8 lbs or more. I wanted to come in a lot closer to the M1 carbine’s feathery 5.2 lbs.

With that in mind, the Cavalry Arms Mk. II lower was the natural choice. A single piece of polymer (vibration-welded together from two injection-molded halves) forms the complete lower receiver/buttstock/pistol grip assembly. This saves a full pound over the weight of a complete A2-style lower, or about a half-pound over the weight of a lower with an M4-style stock.

When I heard that Cavalry Arms, after a long-running dispute with the BATFE, was surrendering their FFL and ending production of lowers, I rushed to grab a black stripped lower while they were still available.

There are a few quirks to building on the Cav lower (covered later in this post), but a regular, off-the-shelf AR lower parts kit basically drops right in. My lower parts kit is from DPMS and is entirely unremarkable; it’s the same kit you can get anywhere for about $60.

The upper needed a bit more thought. I knew I wanted a 16″ barrel, but researching and talking to serious AR geeks led me to go for a midlength gas system, rather than the more common carbine length. Compared to the carbine length gas system, a midlength has significantly lower pressure at the gas port and a shorter dwell time (the time between the bullet passing the gas port and leaving the barrel), both of which contribute to smoother cycling, easier extraction, and less wear and tear on the action.

The gas system advantages of the midlength are its greatest strength, but it also offers a few other benefits. Sight radius is extended a bit by moving the front sight closer to the muzzle. The longer handguard and shorter length of bare barrel just plain looks better to my eye. And yes, unlike a standard 16″ upper, you can put a regular M16/M4 bayonet on a middy. On the down side, it will weigh a tiny bit more than a carbine-length gas system upper, due to the longer gas tube and handguards. I figured the benefits outweighed that slight disadvantage.

Keeping with the “minimum practical weight” plan, I wanted a lightweight contour barrel. Midlength uppers are readily available, if not nearly as popular as carbine-length uppers. Lighweight midlength uppers are not so common. CMMG offered such uppers for a time, but production was discontinued by the time I found out about them. Rock River Arms builds a lightweight midlength, and I planned to get one until I found out about Bravo Company’s version.

The difference? Bravo uses 1:7″ twist barrels (vs. 1:9″ for RRA), M4 feedramps, taper pins on the front sight base, and barrels and bolts that have all been subjected to magnetic particle inspection and proof firing. Basically, Bravo builds to USGI standards, the fact that the military doesn’t use midlength uppers notwithstanding. The RRA upper would probably have worked out just fine, but I was willing to spend a few extra bucks for the Bravo Company upper. Evidently a lot of other people had the same idea, because this batch of uppers sold out in about a day and a half.

barrel

Bravo’s lightweight contour is light under the handguards, flares up to the standard .750″ for the front sight base, and is lathed down to about .580″ between the front sight base and flash hider. More weight could have been saved by using an M16A1-style .625″ front sight base, but those are not easy to find anymore. As it is, turning a quarter-pound off the muzzle end does very nice things for balance and handling.

Putting It All Together

I’m not going to write a how-to on assembling an AR lower; the internet is awash in guides, and really the process just isn’t that hard. If you’ve detail-stripped a few guns and gotten them back together successfully, you can certainly build out an AR lower. I do recommend this guide at ar15.com, along with Stingray’s addenda and the Brownell’s assembly videos.

That said, the CAV-15 lower throws you a few quirks, and I’ll share with you some information I wish I’d had before I started.

A regular AR-15 lower uses the threaded-in buffer tube to hold the buffer retainer captive in its recess. Since the Cav lower lacks a separate buffer tube, it instead uses a transverse roll pin for this purpose. There’s a pre-drilled hole for the pin, but the hole in my lower was poorly drilled and a bit undersize. I carefully chased it with a 5/64″ drill bit, then chased the buffer retainer hole to clear out the plastic shavings.

Now, start the roll pin in its hole, use one hand to compress the buffer retainer and spring into their recess with a pin punch, hold the roll pin punch with your other hand, and use your third hand to tap the roll pin into place. And now you see the problem. You’ll either need an assistant or some kind of dowel or other object to keep the buffer retainer compressed while you tap the crosspin in place. I did not have an assistant on hand. It was a lot of fun.

The other quirk on the CAV-15 is the installation of the selector detent and spring. On a regular AR, these parts are installed from below the receiver and retained by the pistol grip. The Cav’s integral pistol grip makes this impossible. Instead, you have to install the spring and detent from the top, then compress them into place while installing the selector.

Bear in mind you are going to have a very tiny, very pointy piece of metal pointing straight up under heavy spring tension. If you slip, that very tiny, very pointy piece of metal will either embed itself in your ceiling or attain low earth orbit. Decide now whether you would rather laugh or cry when this happens.

The right way to deal with this is a slave punch. Use one small-diameter punch to (CAREFULLY!) compress the selector detent down into its hole, then stick a fat punch in from the right side of the selector hole to capture the detent. When you push the selector into place, it will push the slave pin out and you’ll keep the detent safely captive within the gun. Bask in your clever, tool-using superiority.

The rest of the lower build was uneventful and unremarkable. I did have to slightly open up the bolt catch recess and the gap between the pivot pin lugs on the front of the receiver. The pivot pin boss on my upper was a flat .500″ across, with the gap between the lugs measuring just a few thousandths less. I very slowly, very carefully opened up that gap just enough for a snug fit. Could I have simply forced the parts together? Probably, but that would put a lot of stress on the weld seam at the front of the magazine well, and I really have very little interest in ruining a brand-new, no-longer-made lower receiver!

With everything put together, the gun tips the scales at 5.75 lbs according to my dubious little food scale. I’ll ask the guys at the gun shop to drop it on their postal scale to get an exact number. Not quite the 5.2 lbs of an M1 carbine, but close enough to make me happy. It also balances and handles REALLY nicely.

Bits ‘n’ Pieces

I debated about rear sights for a good while. A regular removable carry handle was my first idea, but they’re actually fairly heavy and I doubted I’d ever use the handle. I eyed the Daniel Defense A1.5 rear sight pretty hard and ALMOST pulled the trigger on ordering one. Then I finally decided that, while there are no immediate plans for an optic, I really ought to get a folding rear sight just in case I eventually want to mount a scope or red dot. I went with the Bravo Company-branded Troy Battle Sight. It’s a pretty simple folding unit with a same-plane aperture and adjustment only for windage; elevation is adjusted at the front sight. Given that I doubt I’ll ever shoot this gun much past 100 yards, I’m not concerned about the lack of elevation adjustment at the rear sight. I did degrease the threads and add a drop of Loctite before screwing it down tight.

My first batch of magazines consists of six aluminum 30-rounders and two aluminum 20-rounders (for bench and prone shooting), all from C-Products. CDNN has good prices on these; $8 for the 30s and $10 for the 20s. I know all the cool kids are running Pmags these days, and I might eventually order a few to try. These ought to work just fine as long as they don’t get stomped or stored loaded for too long.

Finally, I got the Brownell’s/CMMG .22 conversion kit. This is just the latest version of the old Atchisson-style conversion bolt paired up with some Black Dog Machine 27-round magazines. Should make for fun low-cost plinking and teaching new shooters. I’m told that the Aguila Sniper Subsonic round does really well in fast-twist barrels, since it’s basically a long 60-grain bullet loaded in a .22 Short case. I’m going to order a box or two and see how they work out.

Completing the Package

The final piece of the puzzle came to me as a birthday present from my indulgent and long-suffering girlfriend: she gave me a set of Cavalry Arms C8 midlength handguards and helped me snap them into place. With the rifle complete, she hit me with an unexpected question: “What’s her name?”

I’ve never named guns before. Never even thought about it. So I gave my loving girlfriend the honor of bestowing a name. Her immediate answer: Vera.

Then I pointed out the bayonet lug. Her eyes went wide and she said, “Really?!? You HAVE to get one!!!” Have I mentioned I love my girlfriend?

posted by TD at 12:13 am  
« Previous PageNext Page »

17 queries. 0.885 seconds. Powered by WordPress

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!


Stats